Is Resident Evil 3 GOOD OR BAD?

Is Resident Evil 3 GOOD OR BAD?

Resident Evil 3 is out now, and it's… it's fine. It's an excellent-looking, polished game that can be a lot of fun to play. It's far from the worst this series has ever produced, and as I mentioned in my review, it's isolation it's not bad game at all. The problem comes, as it often does, from expectations.

Is RE3 before or after Re2?

The plot of RE3 isn't a direct continuation of the second game. The action of Resident Evil 3 begins the day before the events in Resident Evil 2. As a result, these are two separate stories that, despite taking place in Raccoon City, are not directly related.

What was the problem with Resident Evil 3?

• The biggest of those issues it that it’s too short. Yes, the original Resident Evil 3 was also a short game, and yes, last year’s RE2 was also fairly short, but those games had other things going for them. Resident Evil 3: Nemesis had things such as Live Selections and randomization of various items and pickups that encouraged replays.

Is the Resident Evil 2 remake a bad thing?

• On its own, cuts in remakes don’t necessarily have to be a bad thing. Resident Evil 2 made some cuts itself last year, and most of them – with the exception of zapping and the changes they made to the A and B campaigns – worked out very well.

Why did Capcom cut out clock tower in Resident Evil 3?

• But when you combine cuts with a short length, which we discussed earlier, that does become an issue. Because if Capcom had not cut out the Clock Tower or the Park or the Factory – and if they’ve made the small locations of RE3 a little larger and more fleshed out – they no doubt would have ended up with a respectable length for a campaign.